Skip to main content

About your Search

20100901
20100930
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3
's likely to move us forward. >> if the three of us were to accept as many of us are that the lack of jobs and economic dysfunction is a result of our structure, this is not something you wade out. this is something you have to days and deal with. we have a broken structure. why, peter, do you think our government appears to unwilling to accept the need to deal with it and still have this, we'll just wait this one out attitude? >> the big financial houses have infiltrated the treasury department. the only difference is that we've got from the sixth floor to seventh floor at goldman sachs back down to the sixth floor. they're getting bonuses as big as ever. they're doing municipal workouts that are going to lead to trouble. with regard to china, i know glenn doesn't agree, but we have to do something fundamental about the trade deficit with china if we're going to have enough to mend for what americans make so we can get out of this recession. >> glenn, do you agree that there appears to be at the least, an aspect of denial when it comes to policy action from our government? >> i think it's
discontent that is america. the headlines read tea party coup, bye bye bums and gop nightmare. but to us, this all looks more like the last days of pompeii. >> we can't stay here. we have to go. >> tea party power boiling over in two states, nearly toppling the establishment and a third. christine o'donnell storming the castle, as they are saying in delaware. congressman mike castle who has never lost a race before last night ousted. she will be the party's senate canned do the come november. and of course, guesses who support she has all of a sudden the day after the primary? none other than 2012 presidential front-runner mitt romney. here in new york, carl pal dino stunning perennial loser, lazio. this time, lazio's race to lose. he lost it nearby new hampshire, a fit to the finish, tea party-backed la montan ya narrowly beaten by establishment-support kelly iyat. the recount still to come. clearly, tea partiers fighting the establishment, effectively so in some cases, ineffectively in others but the rumble are indeed afoot. we know they don't like democrat bus don't much care for the
. again, we listen to our members, but ik i think president gave us what we needed. clarity. and the public is with the president. >> that's good. let's see how long it lasts. some republican, meantime, are pushing for a temporary, two-year session for the tax cuts of the top 2%. gee, i wonder that happens in two years? we get a new president. if it's a republican, he'll extend tax cuts indefinitely. as the president would say, let's be clear. history shows us the richest americans don't put tax savings back into the economy. they put it in their pockets. after bush's tax cuts, the savings rate went up compared to clinton's increase. more money into the economy with tax increases. even a one-year extension of tax cuts for the rich would cost us $39 billion. that's another huge hole in the budget. that's what they friend to care so much about. here's what the democrats are never going to do. win an argument if they don't make their own case. the numbers are in. tax cuts for the rich do not stimulate the economy. the american people are sick of giving more tax cuts to the rich
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3